(C) New York Post
Now that the president has admitted he would welcome foreign assistance in interfering with our elections (as long as it helped him personally), one has to wonder why he didn't say this two years ago before the Mueller Team investigated his campaign's ties with the Russians. Amazingly, Mr. Mueller's team outlines dozens and dozens of shady meetings between Russian agents and the Trump inner circle - including Donald Trump, Jr. and Jared Kushner. Despite all of this overwhelming evidence, Mr. Mueller refrained from recommending further criminal indictments against them because he could not ascertain their motive for violating the law. Except for the fact that now the president has admitted that he'd take a look at "Opposition Research" if offered. All good, except they knew or should have known doing so was a direct violation of Federal law. Mueller's conclusion? They didn't know the law well enough to know their actions were illegal. Except with Trump's admission, it becomes more and more obvious they did know. After all, the President sure seems to surround and wrap himself in the army of personal lawyers. One in particular that knew working with the Russians was unlawful? Rudy Giuliani of course. He knew and he knew it all along. Why else has his story changed so many times along with the lies from Trump?
Many that pay attention to matters know that Trump's incessant claims of being victimized by "Fake News" when it reported his campaign's ties with the Russians, appreciate that Mueller did prove that all of the news reported by the New York Times and Washington Post detailing contacts actually were accurate. They were never "Fake News" as claimed by Trump.
So whenever a Trump supporter says Trump was proven "innocent", remember to ask them by whom, because Mueller certainly did not come to that conclusion. In fact, anyone that has a third grade reading literacy level can see the clear message from the Mueller Team - Trump and his campaign were acting outside the law. Also remind them that "Individual One" on the criminal indictment for violating campaign finance laws happens to be Donald Trump himself (See: www.washingtonpost.com/politics/individual-1-trump-emerges-as-a-central-subject-of-mueller-probe/2018/11/29/e3968994-f3f7-11e8-80d0-f7e1948d55f4_story.html?utm_term=.d637f348650c). Now that the Supreme Court has ruled that State and Federal crimes are mutually exclusive and double jeopardy does not apply (See: www.msnbc.com/hallie-jackson/watch/supreme-court-declines-to-change-double-jeopardy-rule-62087237597), Trump and his followers should take note - that the High Court is not required to stand with the President. They are a co-equal branch of government adhering to the principals that no man is above the law. One day (hopefully soon), Trump, his inner circle and his cult-like supporters will learn that they too, must answer to the law. After all - haven't he and his crowd perfected the chant "Lock Her Up"? Don't be to surprised after the election when the chant becomes "Lock HIM up" along with his corrupt advisors and sycophantic family of conmen, grifters and co-conspirators.
As President John F Kennedy once said; " A Nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth or falsehood in an open market is a Nation that is afraid of its people." Answer the damn subpoenas! Stop covering up. Stop lying. For the rest of us, start preparing to defeat Mr. Trump and Trumpism for centuries to come. America needs us now, more than ever! Have a great week.
Many that pay attention to matters know that Trump's incessant claims of being victimized by "Fake News" when it reported his campaign's ties with the Russians, appreciate that Mueller did prove that all of the news reported by the New York Times and Washington Post detailing contacts actually were accurate. They were never "Fake News" as claimed by Trump.
So whenever a Trump supporter says Trump was proven "innocent", remember to ask them by whom, because Mueller certainly did not come to that conclusion. In fact, anyone that has a third grade reading literacy level can see the clear message from the Mueller Team - Trump and his campaign were acting outside the law. Also remind them that "Individual One" on the criminal indictment for violating campaign finance laws happens to be Donald Trump himself (See: www.washingtonpost.com/politics/individual-1-trump-emerges-as-a-central-subject-of-mueller-probe/2018/11/29/e3968994-f3f7-11e8-80d0-f7e1948d55f4_story.html?utm_term=.d637f348650c). Now that the Supreme Court has ruled that State and Federal crimes are mutually exclusive and double jeopardy does not apply (See: www.msnbc.com/hallie-jackson/watch/supreme-court-declines-to-change-double-jeopardy-rule-62087237597), Trump and his followers should take note - that the High Court is not required to stand with the President. They are a co-equal branch of government adhering to the principals that no man is above the law. One day (hopefully soon), Trump, his inner circle and his cult-like supporters will learn that they too, must answer to the law. After all - haven't he and his crowd perfected the chant "Lock Her Up"? Don't be to surprised after the election when the chant becomes "Lock HIM up" along with his corrupt advisors and sycophantic family of conmen, grifters and co-conspirators.
As President John F Kennedy once said; " A Nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth or falsehood in an open market is a Nation that is afraid of its people." Answer the damn subpoenas! Stop covering up. Stop lying. For the rest of us, start preparing to defeat Mr. Trump and Trumpism for centuries to come. America needs us now, more than ever! Have a great week.
RSS Feed
